"In a culture that values intellect more than intuition or emotion, typical environmental education too often emphasizes facts and information in lieu of experience." (Pelo 2009)
This quotes comes under the heading embrace sensuality. As someone who emphasizes science, I will often fall back on facts and logic. But I must always remind myself that there is a sensuality and spirituality to the natural world. One of my pet peeves is people (especially scientists) who view science as cold, hard logic. Even if we use facts and logic to explain natural processes, they do not diminish the spiritual/sensual nature of the world. Sure we can explain why blackberries taste so sweet, facts can't explain why it has such a specific, delicious taste or why experience the flavor affects each person differently on an emotional level. Sure I can explain the forces that govern subatomic particles, but that explanation in no way diminishes my amazement that such a physical system arose in such a way as to be able to create atoms, molecules and so on such that we are living, breathing things. To me, this quote speaks to fostering that feeling of wonder toward the natural world in tandem with those cold, hard facts.
"Culture - The practices, beliefs, traditions, moral norms that give the people a common sense of identity and way of understanding their relationship to the environment and to each other." (EcoJustice Dictionary)
After reading this definition, I began to wonder if we as Americans really have a culture. Actually, we do have a culture, but is it a culture that we are actually aware of. This definition includes some very deep concepts and ideas. Do we really live our lives in full awareness of our culture? Do we fully understand how and why we interact with each other in the way we do? Do we truly connect to the environment in a manner that we are conscious of. I keep thinking back to the Lee Mun Wah video The Color of Fear in which Victor points out that white men have lost their culture. White men like me have a culture, the culture of consumerism. Is it a meaningful one? Is it one that actually allows for deeper connections implied by this definition? My answer is no, and because of that I am truly saddened.
"Place-based education (PBE) immerses students in local heritage, cultures, landscapes, opportunities and experiences, using these as a foundation for the study of language arts, mathematics, social studies, science and other subjects across the curriculum." (Place Based Education)
I really like the ideas on this website, and it gives some really inspiring and constructive stories for how to actually utilize place-based education in the classroom. All too often, classroom teaching occurs in a bubble that separates it from the outside world. We cannot continue an isolationist approach to teaching if we want to be successful. Even if one were to follow a traditional pedagogy that prepares students to enter the work force, it doesn't make sense to not connect to the community where they will be putting those skills into practice. What I'm saying is, although place-based education is more transformative, from a logical perspective it is a great tool regardless of one's views toward the purpose of education.